From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48238) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkqkE-0000gQ-7U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:29:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkqkC-0006Gc-W8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:29:06 -0500 Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:45313) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkqkC-0006GE-RJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:29:04 -0500 Received: from euspt1 (mailout1.w1.samsung.com [210.118.77.11]) by mailout1.w1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0LXM00339CKBOK@mailout1.w1.samsung.com> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 05:28:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [106.109.8.195] by spt1.w1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0LXM0053LCKA3Q@spt1.w1.samsung.com> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 05:28:59 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:28:57 +0400 From: Evgeny Voevodin In-reply-to: Message-id: <4F0D1E19.20308@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <1324640414-16000-1-git-send-email-e.voevodin@samsung.com> <1324640414-16000-3-git-send-email-e.voevodin@samsung.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 02/11] ARM: exynos4210: UART support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: kyungmin.park@samsung.com, m.kozlov@samsung.com, jehyung.lee@samsung.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, d.solodkiy@samsung.com On 01/10/2012 04:11 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> + case UINTP: >> + s->reg[I_(UINTP)]&= ~val; >> + /* XXX: It's the assumption that it works in this way */ > Can you expand this comment a little to clarify exactly what the > assumption you're making is? It was not clear from documentation if UINTSP register bits should be cleared inside this "case" too. Practise has showed that should. I think, this comment message could be removed. -- Kind regards, Evgeny Voevodin, Leading Software Engineer, ASWG, Moscow R&D center, Samsung Electronics e-mail: e.voevodin@samsung.com