Re: sstate info

[Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>]

On 2012-01-12 14:12, Chris Larson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Gary Thomas<gary@mlbassoc.com>  wrote:
>> On 2012-01-12 10:23, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Gary Thomas<gary@mlbassoc.com>    wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> DATE is not important, that is why we are explicitly telling the
>>>>> signature to ignore this variable.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It seems that DATE needs to be ignored other places as well.  Digging
>>>> further, I find:
>>>>
>>>> $ bitbake-diffsigs
>>>>
>>>> p60_poky/tmp/stamps/i686-linux/quilt-native-0.50-r0.do_patch.sigdata.216968eaca38198b88a7520be02e3fca
>>>>
>>>> p60_test_pass1/tmp/stamps/i686-linux/quilt-native-0.50-r0.do_patch.sigdata.0ce7898e700de80ff8afcb0850ec4ed0
>>>> basehash changed from 4863b21531f8236184a7c3b16da3ea13 to
>>>> 7ee430d1251148b2509ef2aefb6e5443
>>>
>>>
>>> You might just try adding to BB_HASHBASE_WHITELIST in bitbake.conf
>>> which should ignore DATE in all recipes. I thought this was there, you
>>> can check the history to see...
>>
>>
>> I'm trying this now.  Of course, touching that variable invalidates
>> the sstate cache, so I won't know until tomorrow if it works.
>
> You can't just override DATE in local.conf? I don't see the point in
> holding off, unless your builds will take till tomorrow to finish?

Actually, I didn't think of that.  I also didn't see this message
until Friday (the next day) due to some network issues, so it's moot.

That notwithstanding, I tried it today (new DATE) and it behaved as
I would like.  The only problem was that dbus-1 is still being rebuilt.
I compared the siginfo files between the two builds and they are
identical, so I don't know why.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------