From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (hermes.mlbassoc.com [64.234.241.98]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C540E006B0 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 08:54:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id B407FF812B7; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 09:54:01 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from hermes.chez-thomas.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A42F812AF; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 09:53:51 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4F10619F.4080002@mlbassoc.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 09:53:51 -0700 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Purdie References: <4F0EAE81.8030800@mlbassoc.com> <20120112131352.GC3452@jama.jama.net> <4F0EE095.1090709@mlbassoc.com> <20120112133749.GD3452@jama.jama.net> <4F0EFD47.1070708@mlbassoc.com> <4F0F1321.8080706@mlbassoc.com> <4F0F4B94.3020604@mlbassoc.com> <4F104C72.8010605@mlbassoc.com> <1326472079.15389.43.camel@ted> In-Reply-To: <1326472079.15389.43.camel@ted> Cc: McClintock Matthew-B29882 , Chris Larson , Poky Project Subject: Re: sstate info X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:54:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2012-01-13 09:27, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 15:40 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: >>>> >>>> You can't just override DATE in local.conf? I don't see the point in >>>> holding off, unless your builds will take till tomorrow to finish? >>> >>> >>> Actually, I didn't think of that. I also didn't see this message >>> until Friday (the next day) due to some network issues, so it's moot. >>> >>> That notwithstanding, I tried it today (new DATE) and it behaved as >>> I would like. The only problem was that dbus-1 is still being rebuilt. >>> I compared the siginfo files between the two builds and they are >>> identical, so I don't know why. >> >> Are the hashes the same too? > > I've found the root cause of this problem and have posted a fix on the > OE-Core mailing list. Cool, I'll start testing this now :-) -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------