Hi Rodolfo,

On 15-Jan-12 4:53 AM, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 04:15:08PM -0600, Alejandro wrote:
>>
>> The patch looks great, and it is definitely more maintainable. I'll
>> create a patch for the w83627ehf driver and send it as soon as
>> possible. Should I make the patch for the w83627hf or wait for
>> Rodolfo???
>
> I already sent a new version of my patches... here you can find a copy
> of my message:
>
>     http://www.spinics.net/lists/lm-sensors/msg33656.html
>
> Please, ask to me whatever you need since I'd like very much these
> patches will be added to the kernel main tree! :)
>
> Ciao,
>
> Rodolfo

The patch as it is posted on "lm-sensors/msg33656.html" mailing list 
does not apply to the latest tree. After making some changes it applies 
cleanly to 3.2 tree. The issues were:

-The gpio naming convention is now "gpio-[name of the driver]" instead 
of "[name of driver]_gpio"
-Line changes in the Kconfig
-Some email addresses converted to @xxxxxxx (by the lm-sensors mailing 
list I guess)

Please look at the attachments for the new patches (I take no credit for 
the changes as it was a trivial clean-up), if you like the changes I 
would recommend starting a new thread on this list to get reviews.

Note: I couldn't test the driver because my platform has not an HF chip 
but the patch looks good so far =)

BR!

Alex