From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Any 4x4 MIMO ath9k NICs coming soon?
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:38:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F15F87E.9090004@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BC4F1E9D-B36A-4C33-A5A6-FE2DF8D856B2@zinkconsulting.com>
On 01/17/2012 02:03 PM, Galen wrote:
> Ben's company focuses on load testing applications, so I assume he's referring to 4 spatial stream systems. 4x4:4 specifically refers to 4 transmit, 4 receive and support for 4 spatial streams. The only commercially available chipset for 802.11n is from Quantenna.
>
> There are 4x4:3 802.11n chipsets available which use the extra radio for beamforming and diversity, but these are not 4 spatial stream. You get an improvement in terms of RF performance, but the MAC layer and throughput is essentially the same as 3x3:3 solutions like AR9380 and AR9390. Since Ben's application is primarily focused on these layers as far as i know, I assumed he was looking for 4 spatial streams.
>
> Keep in mind, beamforming and diversity is very much possible within implementations the 802.11n specification. The only thing really novel to 802.11ac is the addition of optional downlink MU-MIMO.
>
> -Galen
>
> On Jan 17, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> Well, are you talking about:
>>
>> * 11n 4x4 MIMO?
>> * 11ac Multi-user MIMO (where you map stations to separate spatial streams?)
>> * other beamforming/diversity stuff?
I'm mostly just passing on a question that a customer asked me. I assume
they want 4x4 MIMO with 4 spatial streams.
I'll look into 11ac as well.
I'll also take a look at the quantenna offerings, but so far, Atheros is
the only manufacturer that has the driver/hardware support for the virtualization
that we need (since way back in ath5k/madwifi days), so I sort of assumed
that isn't going to change anytime soon...
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-17 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-17 17:12 [ath9k-devel] Any 4x4 MIMO ath9k NICs coming soon? Ben Greear
2012-01-17 19:51 ` Galen
2012-01-17 21:39 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-01-17 22:03 ` Galen
2012-01-17 22:38 ` Ben Greear [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F15F87E.9090004@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.