From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4F17631A.6010106@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:26:02 -0500 From: Mitchell Tasman MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F0B90C6.8040007@domain.hid> <4F0C9C25.5080401@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4F0C9C25.5080401@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Arm support for 3.2 kernel? List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On 01/10/2012 03:14 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 01/10/2012 02:13 AM, Mitchell Tasman wrote (in part): >> Hi. I saw the recent discussion regarding ARM I-pipe and 3.x, and am >> wondering if anyone can hazard a guess as to a timetable for 3.2 support? > > 3.0 is on its way. 3.1 will be next because it is the first version to > support a new I-pipe architecture, so I was hoping to be able to skip 3.2... Thank you for your response to my question(s). I noticed that an arm I-pipe patchset for 3.0.13 recently landed in git. Might you consider making 3.2 the next target for arm I-pipe support rather than 3.1? It seems that 3.1 is already being end-of-lifed, and e.g., that the RT-Preempt community has jumped directly from 3.0 to 3.2. Thanks again and best regards.