From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dirk.behme@de.bosch.com (Dirk Behme) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:06:28 +0100 Subject: imx53 In-Reply-To: <1326925172.3468.300.camel@hp-dhlii> References: <4F16E7B9.7050307@dlasys.net> <1326925172.3468.300.camel@hp-dhlii> Message-ID: <4F17C0F4.3090703@de.bosch.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 18.01.2012 23:19, David Lynch Jr. wrote: > Linus's tree does not yet include numerous imx53 drivers. > While I can get it to boot, there is lots of hardware that does not > work. > > Freescale and others are doing imx53 driver work and most drivers are > available somewhere, though I have not found them all in the same place. > > Regardless, I am just looking for an appropriate reference/starting > point. You might want to have a look to Linaro, too. E.g. http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=bsp/freescale/linux-linaro.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/lt-3.2-imx5 If I understood correctly, from Freescale point of view, the Linaro Freescale landing team is responsible to mainline the Freescale work. Best regards Dirk > What would be the normal route for i.MX53 work into the kernel ? > > I can pull that, start there, merge what I need and submit patches if no > one else does. > > > > On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 17:57 -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:39 PM, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote: >>> Where would I look for the appropriate git kernel source tree that is being >>> used for i.MX53 development feeding the distribution kernel ? >> You can use Linus' tree directly. >> >> Regards, >> >> Fabio Estevam