From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53422) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RnvKX-0005a5-85 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:59:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RnvKV-0005Ok-5T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:59:16 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48352 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RnvKU-0005OP-L8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:59:14 -0500 Message-ID: <4F184B6C.9060004@suse.de> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:57:16 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4EEFAD8E.8050509@rdsoftware.de> <4EEFB11E.10901@codemonkey.ws> <4EEFB2D2.5000900@rdsoftware.de> <4F04DE0A.5050005@rdsoftware.de> <4F173DC3.5020604@rdsoftware.de> <4F184773.1000405@rdsoftware.de> In-Reply-To: <4F184773.1000405@rdsoftware.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] bad USB tablet update rate on qemu-1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Erik Rull Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann Am 19.01.2012 17:40, schrieb Erik Rull: > Erik Rull wrote: >> Erik Rull wrote: >>> Erik Rull wrote: >>>> Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>>> On 12/19/2011 03:33 PM, Erik Rull wrote: >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> coming from qemu 0.14 the usbdevice tablet update rate gets really >>>>>> bad in >>>>>> qemu-1.0 with the same guest. >>>>> >>>>> What's the specific guest? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Anthony Liguori >>>>> >>>> >>>> It's a Windows XP guest. It was fine in 0.14 >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Erik >>>> >>> >>> Any progress here? I tested it on another CPU board there it was wors= e - >>> only 1-2 cursor updates per second :-( >>> I tried to use the wacom-tablet but didn't find a driver that works. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Erik >>> >> >> Hi all, >> >> today I tested some stuff with VNC for remote access of the VM - there >> the >> update rate of the USB tablet (mouse cursor) was really great. So the >> question is now: >> - Same host operating system for 0.14 and 1.0 >> - Same command line parameters beside the vnc option >> Why is the native mouse on the qemu 0.14 system good for both vnc and >> native and on the qemu 1.0 system only good for vnc and bad for the >> native >> hardware mouse? >> >> Maybe this helps finding the source of evil... >> If you have ideas what to change / patches to test, just let me know. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Erik >> >=20 > Hi all, >=20 > I additionally tested -std vga to exclude that it might be related to > the cirrus emulation - but same result. So there seems to be a > difference between the captured cursor for the native X-Windows window > and the VNC window that occured somewhere between 0.14 and 1.0. Then try `git bisect start v1.0 v0.14.0' to find out when exactly the perceived behavior changed. :) Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg