From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lennart Poettering Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] add --initrd argument to mdadm/mdmon Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:27:30 +0100 Message-ID: <4F1A1482.9070809@redhat.com> References: <1326797330-4488-1-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> <4F15D29C.7070504@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F15D29C.7070504@redhat.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Doug Ledford Cc: Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com, neilb@suse.de, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, kay@redhat.com, harald@redhat.com, mschmidt@redhat.com, Lennart Poettering List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 17.01.2012 20:57, Doug Ledford wrote: > > Patch set looks reasonable to me, although you missed adding the new > option to the mdadm man page. If you decide to document this it might make sense to add a reference to http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/RootStorageDaemons which explains the semantics in a bit more detail. > Do we have a specific systemd version for which we know that --initrd is > needed, or a version before which it is the wrong thing to do? Well, systemd honours the '@' starting with v38, and for older versions the '@' is practically a NOP, but not break anything that wasn't broken anyway ;-) Lennart