From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47881) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpJ76-0002Sm-TC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:35:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpJ72-0001ou-Os for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:35:08 -0500 Received: from mail-gx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.161.173]:64334) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpJ72-0001ne-JK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:35:04 -0500 Received: by ggnr1 with SMTP id r1so681578ggn.4 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:35:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F1D53F3.9020306@landley.net> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:34:59 -0600 From: Rob Landley MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F1B0C3E.20905@landley.net> <4F1BB581.6030703@weilnetz.de> <4F1C9EF5.9090105@landley.net> <4F1CBB88.9040806@codemonkey.ws> <4F1CDF4B.9050603@landley.net> <4F1CFF8D.3060106@weilnetz.de> In-Reply-To: <4F1CFF8D.3060106@weilnetz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit 5632ae46 broke the network on mips. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Weil Cc: qemu-devel On 01/23/2012 12:34 AM, Stefan Weil wrote: > Hi Rob, > > the patch was applied after v1.0, and there are two commits for > the stable-1.0 branch and the main development branch. > So I think that your git repository and your analysis is correct. > > Where did you get your v1.0 tarball from? Sigh, I know what happened. I cd'd to the 1.0 tarball directory but used command history to re-run the test, and didn't edit the big $PATH=blah assignment at the start of the line, so that was still an absolute path pointing to the git directory. My bad, tested the wrong version. (I've had a lot of that tracking down this bug, the command line to make it work is very, very long.) Rob