From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53501) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpiFP-0000yK-Er for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:25:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpiFI-0000Mu-Qt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:25:23 -0500 Received: from goliath.siemens.de ([192.35.17.28]:31610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpiFI-0000Mn-FT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:25:16 -0500 Message-ID: <4F1ECD52.4000701@siemens.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:25:06 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F1E7190.6030608@siemens.com> <4F1ECCA2.8040003@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4F1ECCA2.8040003@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] signrom: Rewrite as python script List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: Alexander Graf , Anthony Liguori , Christoph Egger , qemu-devel , Stefan Weil , Paolo Bonzini On 2012-01-24 16:22, Eric Blake wrote: > On 01/24/2012 01:53 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Now that we have a hard dependency on python anyway, we can replace the >> slow shell script to calculate the option ROM checksum with a fast AND >> portable python version. Tested both with python 2.7 and 3.1. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka >> --- >> >> +++ b/scripts/signrom.py >> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ >> +# >> +# Option ROM Signing utility >> +# >> +# Authors: >> +# Jan Kiszka >> +# >> +# This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPLv2. > > Any reason you aren't using GPLv2+, Internal complications. :-/ > >> --- a/scripts/signrom.sh >> +++ /dev/null >> @@ -1,45 +0,0 @@ >> -#!/bin/sh >> - >> -# Option ROM Signing utility >> -# >> -# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >> -# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by >> -# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or >> -# (at your option) any later version. > > especially since you were replacing a more permissive license in the .sh > version? I'm writing new code, this is not a derivative. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux