From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rq3h4-0005N7-Sg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:19:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rq3gz-0002Xj-2Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:19:22 -0500 Received: from goliath.siemens.de ([192.35.17.28]:17265) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rq3gy-0002Wn-JJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:19:17 -0500 Message-ID: <4F200F60.3050206@siemens.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:19:12 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0NmkTZ-1RuP3p2oYy-00DGmw@icpu819.kundenserver.de> In-Reply-To: <0NmkTZ-1RuP3p2oYy-00DGmw@icpu819.kundenserver.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] git bisect results List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: erik.rull@rdsoftware.de Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 2012-01-25 12:48, erik.rull@rdsoftware.de wrote: > Hi Jan, You should CC me then... :) > > This little change fixes my problem with the usb-tablet update rate. > > Can you please verify if this has some side effects? Surely as it disables in general valid code, namely the auto-grabbing feature. You should notice the difference. > > If not, can you post a real patch? > I don't know how to handle the whole patching and committing stuff exactly. We need to understand the problem first anyway, and as I cannot reproduce it, I will need you help: Can you instrument the code, e.g. with printf, to find out which of the disabled branches is taken when, specifically how often? Can you also check if values like max_x/max_y or the ev->motion content make sense for your setup? Thanks, Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux