From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:55:00 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] SPL Framework: Add support for U_BOOT_CMD
In-Reply-To: <CA+M6bXmezJX5WYQh1uK85noKpg4X1bPbUU8gfbGFCP_h9VDu4A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+V-a8vtOyW3X82hNrrzq--CBUHDVvSRR7SrhkwM9q6hUWzW+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABkLObok3tEBmSyHTa2dGm0TjD_C4zzc+MEA06bE9ZkY3KUPZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+V-a8t-wEA_dqEuvpieOU8sO7G1dNOUz2xw-3hX3P1pjPuC-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABkLObox+ZbJrpjqk46Qv+9M8QPtv4BzM91KLQxCn7AEsfSXtw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+M6bXmezJX5WYQh1uK85noKpg4X1bPbUU8gfbGFCP_h9VDu4A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F205004.8040303@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 01/25/2012 12:19 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> Maybe we should poke <command.h> to nop out U_BOOT_CMD for
> CONFIG_SPL_BUILD?  OTOH, #ifndef'ing U_BOOT_CMD and the code itself
> gets us a space savings we wouldn't get otherwise (I suspect giving
> the MTD/NAND issue I've mentioned before)...

Commands should be stripped out already with the new SPL -- that's what
the (unfortunately uncommented) sed command in GEN_UBOOT appears to be
doing.

-Scott