From: Philip Balister <philip@balister.org>
To: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Splitting meta-oe
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:12:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F207E35.3030908@balister.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327525435.2716.37.camel@x121e.pbcl.net>
On 01/25/2012 04:03 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 15:45 -0500, Philip Balister wrote:
>> On 01/25/2012 12:57 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
>>> Agreed. I think the mailing lists ought to remain the primary forum for
>>> decision-making. If there's something that needs to be discussed, let's
>>> do it here. If we can't reach a consensus, that's what we have the TSC
>>> for.
>>
>> I do not want this to discourage from OE developers talking about things
>> like this when they have the chance. Sometimes, high bandwidth face to
>> face conversations can resolve issues much faster.
>
> Absolutely, folks should feel welcome to discuss this and any other
> issues whenever they have the chance. And if no conclusion has emerged
> by the time ELC comes around then that might indeed be a useful way to
> move things forward. But, such face-to-face meetings inevitably involve
> only a subset of developers and the only way to ensure that all
> interested parties are able to participate is to hold discussion on the
> mailing list whenever possible.
Sure. I don't think anyone is suggesting that a few guys get together
and make binding decisions, just try to work through things a little faster.
Philip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-25 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-25 12:48 Splitting meta-oe Paul Eggleton
2012-01-25 14:01 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2012-01-25 14:10 ` Martin Jansa
2012-01-25 15:09 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-01-25 17:01 ` Enrico
2012-01-25 14:34 ` Philip Balister
2012-01-25 14:47 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-01-25 16:00 ` Philip Balister
2012-01-25 17:33 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2012-01-25 17:51 ` Khem Raj
2012-01-26 9:02 ` Martin Jansa
2012-01-26 14:45 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2012-01-26 16:11 ` Martin Jansa
2012-01-26 18:36 ` Andreas Oberritter
2012-01-26 20:04 ` Khem Raj
2012-01-25 17:41 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-01-25 17:57 ` Phil Blundell
[not found] ` <4F2069CC.7060409@balister.org>
2012-01-25 21:03 ` Phil Blundell
2012-01-25 22:12 ` Philip Balister [this message]
2012-01-25 17:49 ` Khem Raj
2012-01-25 18:39 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-01-25 23:28 ` Khem Raj
2012-02-01 10:07 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-02-01 10:33 ` Koen Kooi
2012-02-01 11:11 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-02-01 15:39 ` Koen Kooi
2012-02-05 14:58 ` Koen Kooi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F207E35.3030908@balister.org \
--to=philip@balister.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=philb@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.