From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] infinite revusion patches v9999
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:33:24 -0800
Message-ID: <4F209144.3020306@bwidawsk.net>
References: <bghq00vp6nqnt4tdbg6hqu2e.1327475558311@email.android.com>
	<4F207B17.7090704@bwidawsk.net>
	<20120125233144.GL3896@phenom.ffwll.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from cloud01.chad-versace.us (184-106-247-128.static.cloud-ips.com
	[184.106.247.128])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1B49E812
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:33:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20120125233144.GL3896@phenom.ffwll.local>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On 01/25/2012 03:31 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 01:58:47PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>> On 01/24/2012 11:17 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>>> Revusion.  Fail. null
>>>
>>>
>> To clarify for posterity. I meant, I typo'd the subject of the
>> cover-letter. The patches themselves should be good to merge.
> 
> I think we'll still see a v10k, current one fails the module symbol linker
> check:
> 
> ERROR: "i915_wait_request" [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko] undefined!
> 
> Cheers, Daniel

Yeah it's a one line fix; coming up. I'm not sure how this rebase got
screwed up.