From: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig: fix new choices being skipped upon config update
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:06:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F2125B3.4070000@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120126092603.GQ6305@pengutronix.de>
On 26.1.2012 10:26, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 05:29:05PM -0500, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
[...]
>> will not cause the choice to be considered as NEW, and thus not be asked. The
>> cause of this behavior is that choice's novelty are computed statically right
>> after the saved configuration has been read. At this point, the new dependency's
>> value is still unknown and asserted to be `no'. Moreover, no update to this
>> decision is made afterward.
>>
>> Correct this by dynamically evaluating a choice's novelty, and removing the
>> static evaluation.
>>
>> Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
>> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
>> Cc: Uwe Kleine-Konig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>> Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-Konig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Tested-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Thanks, applied to kbuild.git#kconfig.
> (Please note the umlaut o in my name. If you have problems with that,
> please at least write Kleine-Koenig.)
Fixed.
Michal
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-26 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-20 16:40 inconvenience when hand editing DEBUG_LL in .config Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-20 16:40 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-20 19:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-20 19:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-20 23:34 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-20 23:34 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-20 20:31 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2012-01-20 20:31 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2012-01-23 22:29 ` [PATCH] kconfig: fix new choices being skipped upon config update Arnaud Lacombe
2012-01-26 9:26 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-26 10:06 ` Michal Marek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F2125B3.4070000@suse.cz \
--to=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=lacombar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.