From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4F2173AB.80905@domain.hid> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:39:23 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F202C11.70908@domain.hid> <4F202F4E.6000708@domain.hid> <4F203237.2010102@domain.hid> <4F203353.8030302@domain.hid> <4F2035B6.6090105@domain.hid> <4F203771.6070708@domain.hid> <4F203F7F.70509@domain.hid> <4F204466.1040603@domain.hid> <4F212CC4.6060001@domain.hid> <4F2136E0.4010200@domain.hid> <4F214D7A.5020901@domain.hid> <4F2164D4.2050501@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4F2164D4.2050501@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] Add sigdebug unit test List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Philippe Gerum , Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On 2012-01-26 15:36, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Regarding testability of the second watchdog state: We could add a > syscall to sigtest_module e.g which has the current rt_timer_spin > semantics. Do you think this makes sense? Or some other testing driver? Then I would go that direction. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux