From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com (arroyo.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.40]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3698E00599 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:39:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from dlep26.itg.ti.com ([157.170.170.121]) by arroyo.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id q0RHd0qj031739; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:39:00 -0600 Received: from DFLE70.ent.ti.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dlep26.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0RHd0lF004872; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:39:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by dfle70.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:39:00 -0600 Received: from gtwmills.gt.design.ti.com (gtwmills.gt.design.ti.com [158.218.100.52]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0RHcxT7024031; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:39:00 -0600 Message-ID: <4F22E133.3020608@ti.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:38:59 -0500 From: William Mills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Koen Kooi References: <1327603585-5599-1-git-send-email-Chase.Maupin@ti.com> <4F21D735.5000303@ti.com> <27324814-C581-4BD9-92DF-68FC5CB4CECF@dominion.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] matrix-gui-browser: port from arago overlay X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:39:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 01/27/2012 07:24 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 27 jan. 2012, om 13:09 heeft Andreas Müller het volgende geschreven: > >> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> Since meta-arago is supposed to be as empty as possible and matrix doesn't play well with others it's a bad fit for both meta-arago and meta-oe. Maybe we should split the meta-ti repo into 2 layers: one for BSP things (including sgx, dsp, etc) and one for 'sdk' things (matrix). >>> The idea is to keep reusable TI deliverables together without forcing people to use arago. Putting matrix in meta-arago would mean you can only use it with DISTRO=arago, which is a huge step backwards from the current situation. >>> >> I think splitting out BSP into an own layer is a good idea and sorry >> for another hijacking: This would be a good chance to make it >> independent of angstrom ( e.g ti-hw-bringup ). > > Image reuse is the least of the issues, SOC_FAMILY is a much larger one. > Andreas: Yes, this is the layer stack independence that meta-ti is suppose to have and currently does not. When meta-ti is "done" it is suppose to work in: core layer stack: oe-core + meta-ti yocto layer stack: poky + meta-ti angstrom layer stack: oe-core + meta-oe + meta-angstrom + meta-ti + many more) arago layer stack: TBD but at least oe-core + meta-oe + meta-ti + meta-arago) As Koen points out we have a good many hurdles to get to the above. Stay tuned.