From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com (devils.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.153]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405DBE00599 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:51:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from dlep26.itg.ti.com ([157.170.170.121]) by devils.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id q0RHpO4B025469; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:51:24 -0600 Received: from DFLE71.ent.ti.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dlep26.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0RHpOOu022139; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:51:24 -0600 (CST) Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by dfle71.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:51:24 -0600 Received: from gtwmills.gt.design.ti.com (gtwmills.gt.design.ti.com [158.218.100.52]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0RHpOT6027456; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:51:24 -0600 Message-ID: <4F22E41B.8070708@ti.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:51:23 -0500 From: William Mills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Maupin, Chase" References: <1327603585-5599-1-git-send-email-Chase.Maupin@ti.com> <4F21D735.5000303@ti.com> <27324814-C581-4BD9-92DF-68FC5CB4CECF@dominion.thruhere.net> <7D46E86EC0A8354091174257B2FED1010BF9BA72@DLEE12.ent.ti.com> In-Reply-To: <7D46E86EC0A8354091174257B2FED1010BF9BA72@DLEE12.ent.ti.com> Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] matrix-gui-browser: port from arago overlay X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:51:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 01/27/2012 08:50 AM, Maupin, Chase wrote: > but I definitely don’t think matrix belongs in meta-arago Why, justify. Yes matrix needs to be different than the distro definition on arago but As you point out below the only people using Matrix are Arago and Koen in Angstrom. I think this comes down to not wanting the word "arago" occurring in the Angstrom layer stack. meta-ti should be about using TI chips. Matrix and other demo programs we put together for our demo distro are not essential to using TI chips. > > 1. As of now matrix is only maintained by TI and used by TI (and Koen to some extent) on our products. So I would put this in a layer that we maintain because it would seem strange to me to have to go through another set of maintainers to update the SRCREV of the package we are developing. Particularly if no one is using it. > 2. If people wanted matrix they could still include our layer to get it. If we see that happening a lot a there is a request from a group of people to have this then we could push it lower, but if we are the only ones using it and who care about it then I don't see the reason to move this lower in the layer stack. >