From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754102Ab2A0Tig (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:38:36 -0500 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:60786 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753778Ab2A0Tie (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:38:34 -0500 Message-ID: <4F22FD36.6020309@canonical.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:38:30 -0800 From: John Johansen Organization: Canonical User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120119 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Morris CC: Kees Cook , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] AppArmor: refactor securityfs to use structures References: <1327624163-21576-1-git-send-email-kees@ubuntu.com> In-Reply-To: <1327624163-21576-1-git-send-email-kees@ubuntu.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/26/2012 04:29 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > This is the ground-work for expanding the AppArmor securityfs to include > useful information that the userspace tools can more easily interact with. > Presently, this is only static information about the state of AppArmor. > James, if no one else has issues with these, I will pull these patches into the apparmor tree to batch them together as pull request with some other apparmor patches