From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: add missing block_bio_complete() tracepoint
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:51:43 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F262FEF.9020406@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120130025326.GI17211@htj.dyndns.org>
Hi,
2012-01-30 11:53 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:49:43 AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Yes, blktrace will see both of completions for rq and bio's it
>> contains from now on, and I thought it's your intention? For the
>> bounced bio's, it'll see one more completion per bio.
>
> Umm... no, blktrace users shouldn't see confusing outputs. My point
> was that we should leave raw tracepoints as raw monitor points so that
> they can provide raw data to different users and filter from
> blktrace.c so that the existing users aren't disturbed.
>
That means blktrace should not be changed, and not see duplicated
completions for rq based drivers at all?
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-30 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-29 9:41 [PATCH] block: add missing block_bio_complete() tracepoint Namhyung Kim
2012-01-29 9:41 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-01-29 19:24 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-30 1:44 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-01-30 1:47 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-30 2:22 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-01-30 2:30 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-30 2:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-01-30 2:53 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-30 5:51 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2012-01-30 5:54 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-30 6:02 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-01-30 6:38 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-01-30 6:38 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-01-30 17:05 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-31 6:30 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-01-31 10:39 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-01 2:18 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F262FEF.9020406@gmail.com \
--to=namhyung@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.