From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chad Versace Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel: Fix bufmgr_gem->gen for gen > 4 Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:10:10 -0800 Message-ID: <4F270732.5080403@linux.intel.com> References: <1327945310-24565-1-git-send-email-chad.versace@linux.intel.com> <87ipjtxas2.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E72DF9E961 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:10:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ipjtxas2.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Eric Anholt Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On 01/30/2012 11:14 AM, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:41:50 -0800, Chad Versace wrote: >> If the pci_device's actual gen was > 4, then we stupidly set >> bufmgr_gem->gen = 6. > > Might be worth a note to say that no behavior should change. Still, > > Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt Pushed, with a note about no change in behavior. ---- Chad Versace chad.versace@linux.intel.com