From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com (mail-qw0-f41.google.com [209.85.216.41]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40205E00306 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:33:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by qadz32 with SMTP id z32so2608118qad.14 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:33:49 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jfabernathy@gmail.com designates 10.224.181.198 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.224.181.198; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jfabernathy@gmail.com designates 10.224.181.198 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jfabernathy@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=jfabernathy@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.224.181.198]) by 10.224.181.198 with SMTP id bz6mr9346750qab.74.1327962829436 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:33:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JtX2MwUh1heiWo0VClwyDzwR7DTwMzr7KllLQu/8sj8=; b=MdzAvPtW2vMOH5LyvhYet+8dccBjFXwhf5ih5vN20frR9f2WsXmXYd22EyBYIPm+jx 64FXbik3TZ96jfWtgIUvkHhH3PkU7XOe2NZW1mw1f18SrenIv7IGuauv3EEs7oFhMub/ Ye2+lmUmE29tifkHMohA+Oo7E4JIU0IhCywaU= Received: by 10.224.181.198 with SMTP id bz6mr7993055qab.74.1327962829360; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:33:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.54] (nc-184-3-54-63.dhcp.embarqhsd.net. [184.3.54.63]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g3sm37341436qap.2.2012.01.30.14.33.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:33:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F271AD1.7040302@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:33:53 -0500 From: jfabernathy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yocto@yoctoproject.org References: <4F270FF5.6040909@gmail.com> <4F27118F.2060302@gmail.com> <4F2715BC.2060509@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4F2715BC.2060509@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: So what happened to Edison?? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:33:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/30/2012 05:12 PM, Joshua Lock wrote: > On 30/01/12 13:54, jfabernathy wrote: >> On 01/30/2012 04:51 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:47 PM, jfabernathy >>> wrote: >>>> It seems that something happened today. I could not complete a >>>> build on >>>> edison branch for meta-cedartrail. I copied it to meta-mycdv, but >>>> other >>>> than that same, old same old. I tried the standard unchanged SRCREV >>>> and >>>> also tried the latest. >>> I changed the main yocto 1.2 3.0 kernel repository to 3.0, and pushed >>> some other kernel >>> changes. But if you are purely on edison, and aren't using >>> meta-kernel-dev there >>> shouldn't have been any fallout from those changes. (I built 3.0 >>> several times today >>> myself). >>> >>> Perhaps Josh knows if anything was pushed to edison ? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Bruce >> >> I'm retesting on the tarballs again. If successful I'll try git version >> of edison. I started today with complete new clone of poky and >> meta-intel. > > The Edison branch has been updated today for the upcoming 1.1 release, > did you pull the updates? > > Other than meta-intel are you using any other layers? I will try and > reproduce here. > I tried some stuff this morning like switching branches, then doing git pulls, etc. I was getting such bad results, I figured I had screwed up. I re-cloned both poky and meta-intel earlier today. Maybe around 12 noon EST. > Regards, > Joshua