From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tinyArch.localdomain (unknown [78.110.170.148]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8C6E0030B for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:37:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.74] (unknown [195.171.99.130]) by tinyArch.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1DB6622399 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:15:58 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4F27C42A.9090409@communistcode.co.uk> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:36:26 +0000 From: Jack Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111224 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org References: <20120131004439.GF2032@denix.org> In-Reply-To: <20120131004439.GF2032@denix.org> Subject: Re: meta-ti layer split X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:37:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 31/01/12 00:44, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > All, > > After much debate and further considerations ;) we've decided to split meta-ti > repository into 2 layers to ease up on inter-layer dependencies and to enable > additional use cases of building basic BSP images with a very small set of > layers, only requiring oe-core as a dependency. The proposed split is the > following: > > 1. meta-ti-bsp-core - is the ultra portable layer. Starting out it will > contain only recipes-kernel and recipes-bootloader plus necessary machine > configurations. Depending on the platform, can be as little as basic board > support. > > 2. meta-ti-bsp-extras - provides the full chip functions with perhaps some > extra constraints. Initialy this will contian support for DSP, Graphics, and > Wifi. Provides additional board support for peripherals that may require > software components like DSPBIOS, CodecEngine, gst-ti, firmware etc. Depends > on meta-ti-bsp-core. In the future, if certain technologies prove themselves > well portable, we may move them from meta-ti-bsp-extras to meta-ti-bsp-core. > > I'll be starting the initial work on this in a separate branch, calling for > wider review once ready. > > Please provide feedback. Thanks. > This sounds fantastic. I am looking forward to being able to use an officially supported BSP with the Yocto tools (particularly the beaglebone!). Will the changes initially go into the meta-ti repo on the yocto git or will development start internally and released when deemed 'ready'? Regards, Jack.