From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for tuesday 31 Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:15:58 +0100 Message-ID: <4F27E98E.2080501@suse.de> References: <87ehuhrpel.fsf@elfo.elfo> <4F272A92.2010609@suse.de> <4F272D8C.8020608@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: KVM devel mailing list , Developers qemu-devel , Mitsyanko Igor To: Anthony Liguori , quintela@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43608 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752243Ab2AaNSS (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:18:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4F272D8C.8020608@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 31.01.2012 00:53, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On 01/30/2012 05:41 PM, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >> Am 30.01.2012 19:55, schrieb Juan Quintela: >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >> VMState: >> Anthony specifically said that VMState were not affected by QOM and = that >> patches should not be deferred until the merge. Yet there's no revie= w >> and/or decision-making for a month now. Ping^2 for AHCI+SDHC. >=20 > Do you have pointers (to pending VMState patches)? http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/137732/ (PATCH v4) It's basically about how to deal with variable-sized arrays. (Alex mentioned it on one call around November.) I found ways to deal with subsets of arrays embedded within the struct and variable-sized list of pointers to structs but no solution for a malloc()'ed array of structs. Maybe I'm just too stupid to see. Anyway, no one commented since Xmas. Igor posted (and refined for v2) a patch with a callback-based approach that I find promising. From my view, unofficially Juan is the VMState guy, he's been cc'ed. Are we lacking an official maintainer that cares? Or is Juan the official, undocumented maintainer but simply busy? SUSE's interest is making AHCI migratable, and my VMState workaround fo= r that is simply ugly: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/133066/ (RFC) Therefore I'm waiting for some resolution. Regards, Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3= =BCrnberg From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49535) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsDbM-0007hV-2o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:18:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsDbH-0004Qe-7Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:18:24 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43606 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsDbH-0004QY-1P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:18:19 -0500 Message-ID: <4F27E98E.2080501@suse.de> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:15:58 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87ehuhrpel.fsf@elfo.elfo> <4F272A92.2010609@suse.de> <4F272D8C.8020608@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4F272D8C.8020608@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for tuesday 31 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori , quintela@redhat.com Cc: Mitsyanko Igor , Developers qemu-devel , KVM devel mailing list Am 31.01.2012 00:53, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On 01/30/2012 05:41 PM, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >> Am 30.01.2012 19:55, schrieb Juan Quintela: >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >> VMState: >> Anthony specifically said that VMState were not affected by QOM and th= at >> patches should not be deferred until the merge. Yet there's no review >> and/or decision-making for a month now. Ping^2 for AHCI+SDHC. >=20 > Do you have pointers (to pending VMState patches)? http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/137732/ (PATCH v4) It's basically about how to deal with variable-sized arrays. (Alex mentioned it on one call around November.) I found ways to deal with subsets of arrays embedded within the struct and variable-sized list of pointers to structs but no solution for a malloc()'ed array of structs. Maybe I'm just too stupid to see. Anyway, no one commented since Xmas. Igor posted (and refined for v2) a patch with a callback-based approach that I find promising. From my view, unofficially Juan is the VMState guy, he's been cc'ed. Are we lacking an official maintainer that cares? Or is Juan the official, undocumented maintainer but simply busy? SUSE's interest is making AHCI migratable, and my VMState workaround for that is simply ugly: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/133066/ (RFC) Therefore I'm waiting for some resolution. Regards, Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC= rnberg