From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>,
"Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>,
John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] arm: add device tree support
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 07:25:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F293D40.90804@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA89A1SBezb2DEbMWL5qD+Me3_uXufmneHyxwz4Kj8dBeA@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/01/2012 07:10 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 1 February 2012 13:04, Anthony Liguori<anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
>> How does it race? Devices normally never touch memory so a loader device
>> will be the only thing mucking with memory.
>
> The obvious one is "loader reset function wants to set starting PC to
> entry point of kernel/etc" vs "CPU device reset wants to set starting
> PC to hardware-mandated reset vector". We have this at the moment, of
> course, and I think we implicitly rely on reset handlers being called
> in order of registration...
I'm a bit confused, why can't the kernel loader be implemented in terms of a
firmware blob?
This is what we do for x86 and it solves this problem robustly. Isn't it just a
matter of a few instructions to do a jmp to a known location?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
> (The other irritating case is where the CPU device reset wants
> to read the starting PC out of memory, like the Cortex-M3, but
> really that one is because we don't distinguish "going into reset"
> from "coming out of reset".)
>
> -- PMM
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-01 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-01 0:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] arm: add device tree support Grant Likely
2012-02-01 1:10 ` Alexander Graf
2012-02-01 1:35 ` Paul Brook
2012-02-01 1:44 ` Alexander Graf
2012-02-01 2:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-02-01 2:40 ` John Williams
2012-02-01 13:04 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-02-01 13:10 ` Peter Maydell
2012-02-01 13:25 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2012-02-01 13:32 ` Alexander Graf
2012-02-01 13:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-02-01 13:49 ` Alexander Graf
2012-02-01 13:52 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-02-01 13:55 ` Alexander Graf
2012-02-01 15:13 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-02-01 17:38 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-01 20:59 ` Alexander Graf
2012-02-01 2:35 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-02-22 19:42 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F293D40.90804@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=jeremy.kerr@canonical.com \
--cc=john.williams@petalogix.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.