From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B02E00595 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 19:42:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2012 19:42:44 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="105249561" Received: from unknown (HELO envy.home) ([10.255.14.201]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2012 19:42:43 -0800 Message-ID: <4F2A0615.20508@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:42:13 -0800 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Ashfield References: <4F29F389.9010705@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <4F29F389.9010705@windriver.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Cc: Yocto Project Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2][linux-yocto-3.0] sys940x BSP and boot-live consolidation X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:42:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/01/2012 06:23 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 12-02-01 1:45 PM, Darren Hart wrote: >> The following changes since commit 59314a3523e360796419d76d78c6f7d8c5ef2593: >> >> meta/beagleboard: Using CONFIG_PANEL_GENERIC_DPI=y (2012-01-30 00:50:09 -0500) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> git://git.infradead.org/users/dvhart/linux-yocto-3.0.git meta-sys940x >> http://git.infradead.org/users/dvhart/linux-yocto-3.0.git/shortlog/refs/heads/meta-sys940x > > Merged and pushed. Two questions: Thanks Bruce. > - I also did a commit to the linux-yocto files, do you need them sent > out immediately, or is working with AUTOREV enough for now ? There are > some other updates I'll batch this with, if we can wait. AUTOREV or SRCREVs in meta-intel for this specific BSP which I'll push tomorrow are fine. That bit can wait. > - Is there any reason (outside of not being tested there, and potentially > missing items like emgd), that this shouldn't go to the 3.2 tree as > well ? No reason. I started with 3.0 as we wanted this for ELC and I wasn't sure I wanted to deal with 3.2 quite yet. The other reason was I wanted to do a proper policy/hardware division in the cfg for 3.2 stuff and this is mostly a copy of fri2 - it and the other meta-intel still have a lot of policy in the machine specific fragments. Still hoping to get to that bug number for M3. -- Darren > > Cheers, > > Bruce > >> >> Darren Hart (2): >> meta: sys940x BSP meta data >> Remove boot-live cfg duplication from BSPs >> >> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg | 10 ---- >> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/crownbay/crownbay.cfg | 10 ---- >> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/emenlow/emenlow.cfg | 10 ---- >> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/fishriver/fishriver.cfg | 10 ---- >> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/fri2/fri2.cfg | 10 ---- >> .../bsp/sys940x/sys940x-preempt-rt.scc | 7 +++ >> .../kernel-cache/bsp/sys940x/sys940x-standard.scc | 6 +++ >> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/sys940x/sys940x.cfg | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++ >> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/sys940x/sys940x.scc | 17 ++++++++ >> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/cfg/boot-live.cfg | 3 + >> 10 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/sys940x/sys940x-preempt-rt.scc >> create mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/sys940x/sys940x-standard.scc >> create mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/sys940x/sys940x.cfg >> create mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/sys940x/sys940x.scc >> > -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel