From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ml@communistcode.co.uk>
Received: from tinyArch.localdomain (unknown [78.110.170.148])
	by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71DCE00594
	for <yocto@yoctoproject.org>; Thu,  2 Feb 2012 01:33:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.24] (unknown [195.171.99.130])
	by tinyArch.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19A1326F16
	for <yocto@yoctoproject.org>; Thu,  2 Feb 2012 09:09:54 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <4F2A5859.40509@communistcode.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:33:13 +0000
From: Jack Mitchell <ml@communistcode.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:9.0) Gecko/20111224 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" <yocto@yoctoproject.org>
References: <7E680CB2A76BB8438D08CF13C09FC53A257BE410@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
	<7E680CB2A76BB8438D08CF13C09FC53A34C6EF4D@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <7E680CB2A76BB8438D08CF13C09FC53A34C6EF4D@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Minutes: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, January 31, 2012 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).
X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto <yocto.yoctoproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/options/yocto>,
	<mailto:yocto-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto>
List-Post: <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yocto-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto>,
	<mailto:yocto-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:33:51 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 31/01/12 23:07, Liu, Song wrote:
>
>   - ScottR: would like to encourage people to get back to Scott in 24 hours for his emails clarifying some doc topics. Scott would like to encourage community people to run through the docs and give some feedback. Sean: suggest online review for docs. Scott: we can widen the scope of the review. RP: All docs are in public repos and can be pulled out for review. If people have contribution, please send patches.

If new documentation portions are released I would be happy to give them 
a once over as I'm sure many on the list would if they were alerted to 
the changes.

At the end of the day it's wholly in our interests to ensure that the 
documentation is understandable by end-users and also to read as much as 
we can to improve our own knowledge.

Cheers,
Jack.