From: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
To: "Barros Pena, Belen" <belen.barros.pena@intel.com>
Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" <yocto@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: Hob 1.2 design - Settings dialogue
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:51:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F2B057D.6000905@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CB507144.6E40%belen.barros.pena@intel.com>
Hi Belen,
Sorry this is so long, I don't know how to turn off my verbose switch.
On page 4 you mention Shane's intention to have proxy settings in the UI
- I just want to point out that this is usually an OS level
configuration and we should be wary about how we implement it.
I'd suggest we go so far as to just have a "Change system proxy
settings" button which launches the OS's network configuration settings.
Of course, this opens us up to potential issues around supporting the
multitude of available network configuration tools on Linux but I'd
suggest we start with a lowest common denominator approach and have the
program behave intelligently.
Explicitly we can detect whether the binary gnome-control-center and the
so file /usr/lib64/control-center-1/panels/libnetwork.so exist (being
clever about that path, too) and if so we can execute:
"gnome-control-center display network"
Which will display the network configuration (and therefore proxy)
settings for stock Fedora and Ubuntu desktops.
I understand why the Machines option might be more useful as a list
widget (p5), rather than a combo box, but feel that this is devalued at
least slightly by the fact that the list of available Machines isn't
static and therefore it's not unlikely a user would have to scroll that
list.
One suggestion might be to favour machines with a higher layer priority
by listing them higher in the list?
Although the next page, 5, mentions that the machine list is a combo
box. Is that the case?
Love the package format selection pieces!
For the two parallel threads buttons we should recommend a default value
and set a maximum based on the number of CPU cores - I think there's
been a lot of discussion about this but I'm not certain what the
recommendation which came out of it was.
For the directories on page 13 would it make sense to have a reset
button to more easily get back to the defaults?
That's all folks,
Joshua
On 02/02/12 08:58, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
> I've uploaded a document detailing the design of the Settings dialogue for Hob 1.2 at
>
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/File:Settings-dialogue-design-spec-v1.0.pdf
>
> Sorry it's a boring document instead of a video: it seemed the only way to provide the necessary level of detail
>
> Let me know if you have any questions or comments.
>
> Belen
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
> Registered No. 1134945 (England)
> Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
> VAT No: 860 2173 47
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-02 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-02 16:58 Hob 1.2 design - Settings dialogue Barros Pena, Belen
2012-02-02 17:24 ` Hob 1.2 design - visuals Barros Pena, Belen
2012-02-02 21:19 ` Joshua Lock
2012-02-03 11:52 ` Barros Pena, Belen
2012-02-03 18:32 ` Joshua Lock
2012-02-06 10:29 ` Barros Pena, Belen
2012-02-06 11:42 ` Wang, Shane
2012-02-06 13:54 ` Barros Pena, Belen
2012-02-06 21:56 ` Joshua Lock
2012-02-02 21:43 ` Hob 1.2 design - Settings dialogue Saul Wold
2012-02-03 11:55 ` Barros Pena, Belen
2012-02-02 21:51 ` Joshua Lock [this message]
2012-02-02 22:01 ` Joshua Lock
2012-02-03 17:04 ` Scott Garman
2012-02-03 14:42 ` Barros Pena, Belen
2012-02-03 18:23 ` Joshua Lock
2012-02-06 10:20 ` Barros Pena, Belen
2012-02-07 14:27 ` Barros Pena, Belen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F2B057D.6000905@linux.intel.com \
--to=josh@linux.intel.com \
--cc=belen.barros.pena@intel.com \
--cc=yocto@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.