From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Young Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] auto setup network without netroot Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:43:55 +0800 Message-ID: <4F2F92CB.1000804@redhat.com> References: <20120202075952.GA12412@darkstar.nay.redhat.com> <1328510722.10153.13.camel@obelisk.thedillows.org> <4F2F8666.50907@redhat.com> <4F2F86F6.5010007@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F2F86F6.5010007-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: initramfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Cong Wang Cc: David Dillow , initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, harald-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org On 02/06/2012 03:53 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > On 02/06/2012 03:51 PM, Dave Young wrote: >> I think the key problem is the network setup code split. I would not >> insist on this although I don't like that we must add ip= to have >> network setup > > With your patches, we must have rd.neednet=1. :) So, it is unfair to > only blame ip= approach. I mean for netroot we also must have ip= set because ip= will deal with the network setup. Originally we might have no ip= but with proper netroot param like root=nfs... > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Thanks Dave