Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: Introduce kvm_memory_slot::arch

[Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>]

(2012/01/30 12:48), Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> This is the first step to separate the architecture specific members.
> The rmap and dirty_bitmap can be treated later based on this.


Any further comments?


If patch 4 (v3) looks controversial, please consider taking
patch 1 to 3.

I may use gfn_to_index() for dirty logging.


Thanks,
	Takuya

>
> v1->v2:
>
>    Patch 3:
>    - Removed extra checks for NULL when we create a new slot.
>    - Removed "if (user_alloc)" check taken from the s390 code.
>
>    Patch 4:
>    - Just rebased.
>
>          Takuya
>
>   arch/ia64/include/asm/kvm_host.h    |    3 +
>   arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c            |   10 +++++
>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    3 +
>   arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c          |   10 +++++
>   arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h    |    3 +
>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c            |   10 +++++
>   arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h     |    9 ++++
>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c                  |    5 +-
>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                  |   59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/linux/kvm_host.h            |   18 +++++---
>   virt/kvm/kvm_main.c                 |   76 ++++++----------------------------
>   11 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
>