From: Bill Kendall <wkendall@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfsdump: use the full 32-bit generation number
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:40:09 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F301079.9010505@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120205133648.GA27225@infradead.org>
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 02:09:25PM -0600, Bill Kendall wrote:
>> dump format version has been bumped to 3. xfsdump also required changes to
>> its inode-to-generation cache. This map is not persistent though, so no
>> compatibility or version changes were required there.
>
> Shouldn't the be an option to still generate the old format for
> compatibility reasons?
The new format contains more information than the old. The new
xfsrestore can drop back to using 12-bit generation numbers even
if the dump used 32 bits. It will do this automatically when
applying a series of restores if the oldest dump used only 12 bits.
It's possible that a site would revert to an old xfsdump in the
middle of a series of incremental backups, allowing for the oldest
backup to use 32-bit generation numbers and a newer backup to use
only 12 bits. xfsrestore won't get this right, so a case could be
made for having a "force 12-bit generation numbers" option on
xfsrestore.
You were referring to an xfsdump option. What use case did you
have in mind? Compatibility with an old restore?
Thanks,
Bill
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-06 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-06 20:09 [PATCH] xfsdump: use the full 32-bit generation number Bill Kendall
2012-01-08 0:58 ` David Brown
2012-01-09 14:01 ` Bill Kendall
2012-02-05 13:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-06 17:40 ` Bill Kendall [this message]
2012-02-06 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-07 20:52 ` Bill Kendall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F301079.9010505@sgi.com \
--to=wkendall@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.