From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Ujfalusi Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] MFD: twl6040: Convert to i2c driver, and separate it from twl core Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:52:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4F312C80.2020108@ti.com> References: <1328619678-26080-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <1328619678-26080-3-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <20120207132925.GN3332@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4F31298C.5090008@ti.com> <20120207134344.GP3332@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120207134344.GP3332@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Samuel Ortiz , Tony Lindgren , Santosh Shilimkar , Liam Girdwood , Dmitry Torokhov , Misael Lopez Cruz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 02/07/2012 03:43 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > That just sounds far too icky - I'm really not happy that people have > been doing that in ASoC TBH, it just makes everything more tricky tha= n > it should be. It save a little bit of effort with the control but ju= st > pushes that complexity elsewhere where you're not expecting it. =46air enough. I'll find a way to do this properly. Thanks, P=E9ter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: peter.ujfalusi@ti.com (Peter Ujfalusi) Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:52:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/7] MFD: twl6040: Convert to i2c driver, and separate it from twl core In-Reply-To: <20120207134344.GP3332@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1328619678-26080-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <1328619678-26080-3-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <20120207132925.GN3332@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4F31298C.5090008@ti.com> <20120207134344.GP3332@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <4F312C80.2020108@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 02/07/2012 03:43 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > That just sounds far too icky - I'm really not happy that people have > been doing that in ASoC TBH, it just makes everything more tricky than > it should be. It save a little bit of effort with the control but just > pushes that complexity elsewhere where you're not expecting it. Fair enough. I'll find a way to do this properly. Thanks, P?ter From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756482Ab2BGNwF (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2012 08:52:05 -0500 Received: from na3sys009aog107.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.197]:34757 "EHLO na3sys009aog107.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755875Ab2BGNwD (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2012 08:52:03 -0500 Message-ID: <4F312C80.2020108@ti.com> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:52:00 +0200 From: Peter Ujfalusi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120106 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Brown CC: Samuel Ortiz , Tony Lindgren , Santosh Shilimkar , Liam Girdwood , Dmitry Torokhov , Misael Lopez Cruz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] MFD: twl6040: Convert to i2c driver, and separate it from twl core References: <1328619678-26080-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <1328619678-26080-3-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <20120207132925.GN3332@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4F31298C.5090008@ti.com> <20120207134344.GP3332@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> In-Reply-To: <20120207134344.GP3332@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/07/2012 03:43 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > That just sounds far too icky - I'm really not happy that people have > been doing that in ASoC TBH, it just makes everything more tricky than > it should be. It save a little bit of effort with the control but just > pushes that complexity elsewhere where you're not expecting it. Fair enough. I'll find a way to do this properly. Thanks, Péter