From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, X86 <x86@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] kvm : vmx : Remove yield_on_hlt
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:04:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F31679E.3040408@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120207174919.3848.99779.sendpatchset@oc5400248562.ibm.com>
On 02/07/2012 11:49 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> yield_on_hlt was introduced for CPU bandwidth capping. now it is redundant
> with CFS hardlimit.
>
> yield_on_hlt also complicates the scenario in paravirtual environment, that
> needs to trap halt. for e.g. paravirtualized ticket spinlocks.
>
> Changelog:
> Remove the support for yield_on_hlt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T<raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index d29216c..2fb3009 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -70,9 +70,6 @@ module_param(emulate_invalid_guest_state, bool, S_IRUGO);
> static bool __read_mostly vmm_exclusive = 1;
> module_param(vmm_exclusive, bool, S_IRUGO);
>
> -static bool __read_mostly yield_on_hlt = 1;
> -module_param(yield_on_hlt, bool, S_IRUGO);
> -
> static bool __read_mostly fasteoi = 1;
> module_param(fasteoi, bool, S_IRUGO);
>
> @@ -1655,17 +1652,6 @@ static void skip_emulated_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> vmx_set_interrupt_shadow(vcpu, 0);
> }
>
> -static void vmx_clear_hlt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - /* Ensure that we clear the HLT state in the VMCS. We don't need to
> - * explicitly skip the instruction because if the HLT state is set, then
> - * the instruction is already executing and RIP has already been
> - * advanced. */
> - if (!yield_on_hlt&&
> - vmcs_read32(GUEST_ACTIVITY_STATE) == GUEST_ACTIVITY_HLT)
> - vmcs_write32(GUEST_ACTIVITY_STATE, GUEST_ACTIVITY_ACTIVE);
> -}
> -
> /*
> * KVM wants to inject page-faults which it got to the guest. This function
> * checks whether in a nested guest, we need to inject them to L1 or L2.
> @@ -1718,7 +1704,6 @@ static void vmx_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned nr,
> intr_info |= INTR_TYPE_HARD_EXCEPTION;
>
> vmcs_write32(VM_ENTRY_INTR_INFO_FIELD, intr_info);
> - vmx_clear_hlt(vcpu);
> }
>
> static bool vmx_rdtscp_supported(void)
> @@ -2399,7 +2384,7 @@ static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf)
> &_pin_based_exec_control)< 0)
> return -EIO;
>
> - min =
> + min = CPU_BASED_HLT_EXITING |
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> CPU_BASED_CR8_LOAD_EXITING |
> CPU_BASED_CR8_STORE_EXITING |
> @@ -2414,9 +2399,6 @@ static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf)
> CPU_BASED_INVLPG_EXITING |
> CPU_BASED_RDPMC_EXITING;
>
> - if (yield_on_hlt)
> - min |= CPU_BASED_HLT_EXITING;
> -
> opt = CPU_BASED_TPR_SHADOW |
> CPU_BASED_USE_MSR_BITMAPS |
> CPU_BASED_ACTIVATE_SECONDARY_CONTROLS;
> @@ -4003,7 +3985,6 @@ static void vmx_inject_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> } else
> intr |= INTR_TYPE_EXT_INTR;
> vmcs_write32(VM_ENTRY_INTR_INFO_FIELD, intr);
> - vmx_clear_hlt(vcpu);
> }
>
> static void vmx_inject_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -4035,7 +4016,6 @@ static void vmx_inject_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> }
> vmcs_write32(VM_ENTRY_INTR_INFO_FIELD,
> INTR_TYPE_NMI_INTR | INTR_INFO_VALID_MASK | NMI_VECTOR);
> - vmx_clear_hlt(vcpu);
> }
>
> static int vmx_nmi_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-07 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-07 17:49 [PATCH 1/1] kvm : vmx : Remove yield_on_hlt Raghavendra K T
2012-02-07 18:04 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2012-02-07 21:15 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F31679E.3040408@us.ibm.com \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.