From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tinyArch.localdomain (unknown [78.110.170.148]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8102AE01372 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 01:18:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.52] (unknown [195.171.99.130]) by tinyArch.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2B6E27FB6 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:45:28 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4F323DAB.1020204@communistcode.co.uk> Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:17:31 +0000 From: Jack Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120205 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yocto@yoctoproject.org References: <752F5B12-4CCB-4C62-A1DE-61EA5BD21CE9@keylevel.com> <4F31C75B.2090703@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Raspberry Pi X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:18:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/02/12 02:36, Brian Hutchinson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Joshua Lock wrote: >> Somehow they managed to convince Broadcom to release a datasheet for the >> SoC: http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/615 > One of my friends sent me a funny quote he saw today: > > "The most amazing thing about this device is the ability to download a > Broadcom spec sheet without a pile of signed NDA's, 4 months of > negotiations, and not having to talk to a single lawyer. Way more > impressive than a $35 Linux board! :D" > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto Very impressive indeed. I run a Raspberry Pi website at the moment, and in due course I plan on (attempting) to write a BSP for Yocto and maybe do a blog post on setting up quemuarm so people can play with a cross compile toolchain and learn how to use yocto in the process. However, have you seen the kernel sources? Very slapdash in places, someone is going to spend a lot of time if they wish to get them upstream, they didn't even release them as patches, just as a source tree... tut tut.