From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com (devils.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.153]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93320E00307 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:03:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from dlep26.itg.ti.com ([157.170.170.121]) by devils.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id q19G3BSR025845; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 10:03:11 -0600 Received: from DFLE71.ent.ti.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dlep26.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q19G3Bmr001554; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 10:03:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by dfle71.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 10:03:11 -0600 Received: from [172.24.0.208] (h0-208.vpn.ti.com [172.24.0.208]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q19G378m014755; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 10:03:08 -0600 Message-ID: <4F331E78.3000302@ti.com> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 20:16:40 -0500 From: William Mills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Abernathy References: <4F32F016.4020008@gmail.com> <4F32F1B3.8090000@mlbassoc.com> <4F32F31B.2000303@gmail.com> <59EDC5ED-F339-48E8-8C4D-7137C23927CD@dominion.thruhere.net> <4F32F59B.7010804@mlbassoc.com> <8EA0B5D5-4DC5-4F48-83E6-B019862BD57F@dominion.thruhere.net> <4F32F87E.2070907@mlbassoc.com> <38997C75-E36D-4A49-96D0-FB5E8A52817D@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <38997C75-E36D-4A49-96D0-FB5E8A52817D@gmail.com> Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: building Yocto for Pandaboard X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:03:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/08/2012 05:51 PM, James Abernathy wrote: > > On Feb 8, 2012, at 5:34 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: > >> On 2012-02-08 15:27, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> >>> Op 8 feb. 2012, om 23:22 heeft Gary Thomas het volgende geschreven: >>> >>>> On 2012-02-08 15:18, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Op 8 feb. 2012, om 23:11 heeft jfabernathy het volgende geschreven: >>>>> >>>>>> On 02/08/2012 05:05 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: >>>>>>> On 2012-02-08 14:58, jfabernathy wrote: >>>>>>>> I'm trying to build the pandaboard BSP for Yocto. I cloned the meta-ti repository in the poky directory and tried to build core-image-sato for both machine pandaboard and >>>>>>>> omap4430-panda. However, I immediately get an error because bitbake is looking for recipes-images/angstrom/systemd-image.bb, which is required in the ti-hw-bringup-image.bb image >>>>>>>> recipe. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All I really included was the machine name change in local.conf and added the meta-ti layer in bblayers.conf. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Did I miss a step? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This was discussed last week. Add this line to your local.conf >>>>>>> BBMASK = ".*/meta-ti/recipes-misc/" >>>>>>> This will skip some BeagleBoard/BeagleBone recipes that are not >>>>>>> currently working in a Yocto tree. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks a bunch. That got it going. The README said nothing >>>>> >>>>> Stop spreading such lies! >>>> >>>> It's not a lie, just a perspective. >>> >>> It *is* a lie, since the README is non-empty. Regardless of what you want to do, the README does contain content. I for one read that as Gary intended, that the README did not say anything about how to get it to work with Yocto. Can we word things is a less confrontational way please? >> >> Sorry, I thought you were referring to my work-around to get this >> going in Yocto. Obviously, he was looking for more info in the >> README than just how to use this layer with Angstrom and I agree >> that this "trick" probably does not belong in the README. >> >> -- > > Wow! Sorry I jumped into a mailing list I obviously don't understand or belong in. There was nothing wrong with your question. As Gary said there has not been too many end user questions on meta-ti yet. Of course someone has to be first. meta-ti is still in early development. It started life working only in an Angstrom context. We are making changes that will make most of it work with just oe-core or yocto/poky but that is not ready yet. Gary's work around is an interesting approximation of what we are shooting for. > I apologize if I offended. I did read the README, but it didn't make a bit of sense to me because it talked about angstrom, which I don't know anything about and wondered what that had to do with yocto. My current Yocto knowledge is based on the meta-intel layer, which doesn't mention angstrom. It sounds like the hint/trick that Gary mentioned will make bitbake build with just yocto, which is what I want. My goal is more of a proof of concept. I'd like to prove if you could take the same image recipe and move it from Pandaboard to Atom and vice versa. That way a developer could pick the hardware platform based on the performance, features, and cost. The software effort should be minimal to move if the Yocto concept works as advertised. > > Jim A > >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> Gary Thomas | Consulting for the >> MLB Associates | Embedded world >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> meta-ti mailing list >> meta-ti@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti > > _______________________________________________ > meta-ti mailing list > meta-ti@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti