From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59718) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RvO7x-0005U4-Ql for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:09:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RvO7t-0000z8-AN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:09:09 -0500 Received: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.12]:42080) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RvO7t-0000vZ-66 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:09:05 -0500 Received: from euspt1 (mailout2.w1.samsung.com [210.118.77.12]) by mailout2.w1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0LZ4000XV6J1TO@mailout2.w1.samsung.com> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:09:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [106.109.9.191] by spt1.w1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0LZ400INQ6J1NR@spt1.w1.samsung.com> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:09:01 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:08:59 +0400 From: Evgeny Voevodin In-reply-to: <4F33653A.9050908@samsung.com> Message-id: <4F33710B.8070809@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <4F3356BA.9080000@samsung.com> <4F336413.1010407@samsung.com> <4F33653A.9050908@samsung.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Broken realview List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Dmitry Solodkiy On 02/09/2012 10:18 AM, Evgeny Voevodin wrote: > On 02/09/2012 10:15 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 9 February 2012 06:13, Evgeny Voevodin wrote: >>> It seems that we have to rebase our exynos boards again ). So, am I >>> right >>> supposing that exynos will not be applied until all QOM patch sets >>> landed? >> >> Anthony claims there aren't any more QOM patchsets which touch all the >> files in the tree, so now is probably a good time to rebase and >> resubmit... >> >> -- PMM >> >> > > Oh, good news :) Today be ready to receive v14 then. > Offtopic: Peter, what do you think is better for our Exynos platform since it runs only on two CPUs: - ignore smp_cpus (and throw a warning if "-smp" not equals to 2) or - rewrite smp_cpus and use it (and throw a warning if "-smp" not equals to 2) -- Kind regards, Evgeny Voevodin, Leading Software Engineer, ASWG, Moscow R&D center, Samsung Electronics e-mail: e.voevodin@samsung.com