From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tinyArch.localdomain (unknown [78.110.170.148]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E00E00307 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:34:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.29] (unknown [195.171.99.130]) by tinyArch.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0DCD20654; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 15:59:44 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4F33F563.5060402@communistcode.co.uk> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:33:39 +0000 From: Jack Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120205 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Hutchinson References: <4F33F01E.2000601@communistcode.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Beaglebone kernel/u-boot/userspace X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:34:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/02/12 16:30, Brian Hutchinson wrote: > I've not seen anything like you describe but I can say that I recently > checked out master and didn't do anything different to it and was able > to build a core-image-base for BeagleBoard just fine without having to > mess with any other layers. > > It is my understanding that you only have to mess with meta-ti if you > are working with TI processors other than what is on the BeagleBoard. > > Regards, > > Brian Hi Brian, Thanks for taking time to reply but take note that I attempting to build for the beagleBONE, I do also have a beagleboard which I can build for without using additional layers. Cheers, Jack.