From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-relay2.palm.com ([64.28.152.243]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RvaPE-0006ou-Iq for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:15:48 +0100 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,392,1325491200"; d="scan'208";a="11547559" Received: from unknown (HELO ushqusdns3.palm.com) ([148.92.223.90]) by smtp-relay2.palm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 09 Feb 2012 12:06:37 -0800 Received: from fuji.noir.com ([10.100.2.25]) by ushqusdns3.palm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q19K6PTj023809; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 12:06:25 -0800 Message-ID: <4F34274B.60502@palm.com> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:06:35 -0800 From: Rich Pixley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4F33048E.8030109@palm.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: bitbake versions X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:15:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Er... wasn't doing so intentionally. Was just following the "getting started" page on the wiki. I think that page needs to be adjusted to at least warn folks that it's stale. That probably isn't the right way to "get started" today. I'll start over from 'core. --rich On 2/8/12 17:47 , Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Rich Pixley wrote: >> I'm having trouble even parsing using bitbake> 1.12. >> >> Am I right in thinking that the openembedded tree isn't ready to be built >> with bitbake> 1.12? > I have used 1.10.x successfully with old oe classic but that was sometime ago > if you want to use oe classic please use the > 2011.03-maintenance branch you stand a better chance with that branch > > >> If so, then the getting started document should probably include this info. > yes getting started should reflect how to get started with layered oe. > >> --rich >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel