From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Low-level Ethernet debugging features. Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:42:58 -0800 Message-ID: <4F34AE62.6070409@candelatech.com> References: <1328730885-10941-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> <4F349DB0.1010903@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff Kirsher , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:38345 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758959Ab2BJFnE (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:43:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4F349DB0.1010903@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/09/2012 08:31 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > Thanks Ben! > > I have applied the series of 10 patches to my queue. I would like to > have our validation team validate the e100, e1000 and e1000e patches > (and in-directly the net patches). Just in case you can generate errored frames other than ones with just bad FCS, I'm curious to know if rx-all logic works with them. I was thinking I might could get at least some NICs to generate Runt frames by sending small pkts and disabling frame padding, but haven't looked into it too hard yet. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com