From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Subject: Default bridge for xl
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:44:51 +0100
Message-ID: <4F353B73.1050309@canonical.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

If I did not miss something, it looks to me like guests started with xl will use
the bridge specified in the guest config or xenbr0 as a default.
Just wondering whether adding a defaultbridge config option to xl.conf would be
considered a waste of time (because its not desired to have that) or some worth
of adding when I would come up with a patch?

Cheers,
-Stefan