From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Clean up x86 CPU auto-loading
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:00:31 -0800
Message-ID: <4F387CCF.7040604@zytor.com>
References: <1329000256.325.48.camel@deadeye> <201202130010.57492.trenn@suse.de> <20120213021847.GA25382@kroah.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120213021847.GA25382@kroah.com>
Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, x86@kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org

On 02/12/2012 06:18 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> I can take them, unless the x86 maintainers object and want to take them
> through their tree.

Why don't we take them... I think it makes more sense long-term.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.