From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfgang Grandegger Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] can/sja1000: add support for PEAK-System PCMCIA card Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:02:09 +0100 Message-ID: <4F38EDB1.7080209@grandegger.com> References: <1328543779-9209-1-git-send-email-s.grosjean@peak-system.com> <4F38D46D.5010406@pengutronix.de> <4F38DF75.3040000@peak-system.com> <4F38E274.4050304@grandegger.com> <4F38E8DA.9060000@hartkopp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ngcobalt02.manitu.net ([217.11.48.102]:48719 "EHLO ngcobalt02.manitu.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753842Ab2BMLCT (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:02:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4F38E8DA.9060000@hartkopp.net> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Oliver Hartkopp Cc: Stephane Grosjean , Marc Kleine-Budde , linux-can Mailing List On 02/13/2012 11:41 AM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > On 13.02.2012 11:14, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c >>>> b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c >>>> index ebbcfca..f7526a7 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c >>>> @@ -493,6 +493,10 @@ irqreturn_t sja1000_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) >>>> n++; >>>> status = priv->read_reg(priv, REG_SR); >>>> >>>> + /* check for absent controller due to hw unplug */ >>>> + if (status == 0xFF) >>>> + break; >>>> + >>>> if (isrc& IRQ_WUI) >>>> netdev_warn(dev, "wakeup interrupt\n"); >>>> >>>> @@ -504,8 +508,8 @@ irqreturn_t sja1000_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) >>>> netif_wake_queue(dev); >>>> } >>>> if (isrc& IRQ_RI) { >>>> - /* receive interrupt */ >>>> - while (status& SR_RBS) { >>>> + /* receive interrupt / check for absent controller */ >>>> + while (status& SR_RBS&& status != 0xFF) { >>>> sja1000_rx(dev); >>>> status = priv->read_reg(priv, REG_SR); >>>> } >>>> >>>> @Stephane: Can you check that patch? I'm out of hw right now. >>> >>> I confirm that this patch works too... >>> So I think I should be able to post a new version of the peak_pcmcia >>> during that day (the previous should work but some calls to >>> pcmcia_dev_present() are no more useful...) >> >> But that fix should not go to the common interrupt handler, if possible. > > > Do you have an idea how to handle the while() statement without copying the > entire interrupt handler code for the devices that might be unplugged? > > IMHO this patch is pretty cheap. I think it's enough to add a read in the custom pcmcia isr before calling sja1000_interrupt(). Maybe the race window is a bit lower but we are not able to react when the unplug happens anyway. Wolfgang.