From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jaehoon Chung Subject: Re: [RFC] MMC-4.5 Context ID Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:16:40 +0900 Message-ID: <4F39C408.6020501@samsung.com> References: <1328110021-15199-1-git-send-email-saugata.das@stericsson.com> <4F2F649E.2010106@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]:28796 "EHLO mailout3.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751515Ab2BNCQm (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:16:42 -0500 Received: from epcpsbgm1.samsung.com (mailout3.samsung.com [203.254.224.33]) by mailout3.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-19.01 64bit (built Sep 7 2010)) with ESMTP id <0LZD00L7H2B84WC0@mailout3.samsung.com> for linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:16:41 +0900 (KST) Received: from [165.213.219.108] by mmp2.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-19.01 64bit (built Sep 7 2010)) with ESMTPA id <0LZD009WX2BS2H50@mmp2.samsung.com> for linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:16:40 +0900 (KST) In-reply-to: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Saugata Das Cc: Chris Ball , Jaehoon Chung , Saugata Das , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org On 02/14/2012 05:37 AM, Saugata Das wrote: > On 12 February 2012 02:27, Chris Ball wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Feb 06 2012, Saugata Das wrote: >>> Thanks for the info. Perhaps the initial MMC-4.5 device samples do not >>> implement this command well. Yes, this feature is good to have in the >>> kernel. I shall wait for some more comments on the proposed >>> implementation before submitting the patch. >> >> I'm not very excited about merging features that offer no concrete >> benefit, because it just grows the kernel (and list of places where bugs >> can occur) for no benefit. So, it would be great if we could find a >> device that actually implements these contexts in a way that provides >> a performance benefit, to prove that adding the code is worthwhile. >> > > Completely agree with you. The purpose of proposing this > implementation under [RFC] was to trigger some discussion on how this > feature should be implemented. I agreed, too. i think Saugata's patch isn't completely we need the discussion to use this feature I will also check what need for this.. Thanks, Jaehoon Chung > >> Thanks, >> >> - Chris. >> -- >> Chris Ball >> One Laptop Per Child > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >