From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45181) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxGiX-0002mW-6z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:38:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxGiR-0003on-IW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:38:41 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54536 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxGiR-0003oi-Cl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:38:35 -0500 Message-ID: <4F3A47B6.7040609@suse.de> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:38:30 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F399FBD.4050302@twiddle.net> In-Reply-To: <4F399FBD.4050302@twiddle.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] AREG0 patches v5 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: Blue Swirl , qemu-devel , Aurelien Jarno Am 14.02.2012 00:41, schrieb Richard Henderson: > On 02/13/2012 12:13 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: >> Blue Swirl (6): >> TCG: split i386 and x86_64 >> TCG: clean up i386 and x86_64 >=20 > I object to these. I do NOT think splitting these makes the code base > as a whole any cleaner. >=20 > Is this really just about the differences wrt the softmmu templates? > Surely that can be handled without duping the entire host port... FWIW ppc and ppc64 use different directories, too. Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC= rnberg