From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Friesen Subject: Re: bonding with 3c59x driver Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:06:54 -0600 Message-ID: <4F3ACCEE.6070701@genband.com> References: <201202132253.16496.jdelvare@suse.de> <1329218017.2336.5.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <4F3AA779.3080409@hp.com> <201202142027.13147.jdelvare@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Rick Jones , Eric Dumazet , Steffen Klassert , Jay Vosburgh , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Jean Delvare Return-path: Received: from exprod7og105.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.163]:54106 "EHLO exprod7og105.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761222Ab2BNVIB (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:08:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201202142027.13147.jdelvare@suse.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/14/2012 01:27 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > Without the patch above, doing bonding on top of 3c59x is simply not > possible, at least not in active-backup mode. For other modes it depends > if you are only interested in load balancing or also on redundancy. Could you just use arp monitoring instead of mii? Chris -- Chris Friesen Software Developer GENBAND chris.friesen@genband.com www.genband.com