From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kai Bankett Subject: Re: [PATCH] qnx4fs: small cleanup Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 03:58:48 +0100 Message-ID: <4F3B1F68.1050708@ontika.net> References: <4F386ACD.2010908@ontika.net> <20120214040030.GY23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Al Viro Return-path: Received: from mailout11.t-online.de ([194.25.134.85]:50399 "EHLO mailout11.t-online.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755213Ab2BOB6w (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:58:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20120214040030.GY23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/14/2012 05:00 AM, Al Viro wrote: > Overall, the code could use quite a bit of cleanup. I don't know if they > have evaluation images that could run under qemu and if the license allows > experimenting with fs images anyway; if anyone knows (or can run the tests > on their box), please yell - I'd rather not play with cleanup patches > without testing, but the codebase isn't large or complex enough to make > writing the patches to test particulary hard. Yes, fully agree. Not sure if the source is still actively maintained? However, I could offer to take a look at it as soon as I made sufficient progress with the qnx6fs stuff. I could then test it by mounting a qnx4fs and properly test it + send some patches. At least I am "somehow" in the qnx4fs source already ... Kai