From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:04:45 +0900 Message-ID: <4F3CFEED.6060206@samsung.com> References: <1328032576-9269-1-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org> <003401cce730$baf979a0$30ec6ce0$%kim@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:62428 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751487Ab2BPNEv (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:04:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Ball Cc: Kukjin Kim , 'Thomas Abraham' , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, rob.herring@calxeda.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, patches@linaro.org On 02/12/12 06:37, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 09 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> Looks ok to me and I'd like to pick this series in samsung tree with Chris' >> ack. >> >> Chris, is it ok? If you need to merge this in your tree, please let me know. >> I will provide topic branch for it. >> >> If any problems, please let me know. > > I don't have a very strong opinion, but I think it's probably better to > go via the mmc tree since the patch is so large and hence the chance of > conflict before merging is high. Thanks, > Hi Chris, I mean if I or you create topic branch for this whole series, can be merged into both tree for avoiding conflicts with further working. Of course, the topic branch don't have to rebase after merging into each tree. If you're ok on this and my opinion, let me create the topic branch. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:04:45 +0900 Subject: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support In-Reply-To: References: <1328032576-9269-1-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org> <003401cce730$baf979a0$30ec6ce0$%kim@samsung.com> Message-ID: <4F3CFEED.6060206@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 02/12/12 06:37, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 09 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> Looks ok to me and I'd like to pick this series in samsung tree with Chris' >> ack. >> >> Chris, is it ok? If you need to merge this in your tree, please let me know. >> I will provide topic branch for it. >> >> If any problems, please let me know. > > I don't have a very strong opinion, but I think it's probably better to > go via the mmc tree since the patch is so large and hence the chance of > conflict before merging is high. Thanks, > Hi Chris, I mean if I or you create topic branch for this whole series, can be merged into both tree for avoiding conflicts with further working. Of course, the topic branch don't have to rebase after merging into each tree. If you're ok on this and my opinion, let me create the topic branch. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.