From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752710Ab2BUFjm (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:39:42 -0500 Received: from hqemgate03.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.140]:17081 "EHLO hqemgate03.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751800Ab2BUFjj (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:39:39 -0500 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp07.nvidia.com on Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:39:25 -0800 Message-ID: <4F432D7A.7030805@nvidia.com> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:06:58 +0530 From: Laxman Dewangan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Axel Lin CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Mike Rapoport , Cyril Chemparathy , Graeme Gregory , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Group TI TPSxxxxx regulators together References: <1329799491.7033.1.camel@phoenix> In-Reply-To: <1329799491.7033.1.camel@phoenix> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 21 February 2012 10:14 AM, Axel Lin wrote: > Group TI TPSxxxxx regulators together and sort them in alphabetical order. > This change makes it easier for users to find config options. > > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin > Cc: Mike Rapoport > Cc: Cyril Chemparathy > Cc: Graeme Gregory > Cc: Laxman Dewangan > --- Should we only arrange the tps regulators or all regulators in alphabetical order? I will prefer to arrange all which inherently will arrange tps as all ti regulators start with tps..