From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx14.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.19]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1L9mtIX009323 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:48:55 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com (mail-ee0-f46.google.com [74.125.83.46]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1L9mrSv023639 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:48:54 -0500 Received: by eekc14 with SMTP id c14so2566482eek.33 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:48:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F436883.3090106@profitbricks.com> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:48:51 +0100 From: Sebastian Riemer MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F3D098F.4010709@profitbricks.com> <20120220215911.GJ6331@barkeeper1-xen.linbit> <20120220164151.0c7f1b7a@bettercgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20120220164151.0c7f1b7a@bettercgi.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Allocation Policy for Cloud Computing needed Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development On 20/02/12 23:41, Ray Morris wrote: > Since you're using RAID anyway, consider testing RAID 10, which will > distribute IO across spindles. I've already tested RAID-10 with MD as well as letting LVM do the striping. This is total equal: There are too many IO processes on all spindles for good performance. All r/w-heads in RAID-10 have to be repositioned over and over again. Even in random IO this only reads from a single spindle per RAID-1 array. Without striping MD RAID-1 has a good read balancing algorithm. With that I can read from both spindles in the RAID-1 array simultaneously. > For scripting, see Linux::LVM on CPAN. It gives you that information > as a nice data structure. I welcome feature requests and patches. > (Linux::LVM::Do coming soon for modifying rather than just querying > LVM objects.) Thanks, I'll look at that. Cheers, Sebastian